Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:
CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
At One Glance
Features, VRM
VRM, Layout
BIOS and the Bugs
Test Setup, Impressions
Sandra and Resolutions
IDE and ContentCreation
Gaming Performance

Overclocking, Conclusion

Flame the Author

Shuttle Deals

 Shuttle SN41G2   
Ultimately KickAss
(Review by MS, January 23, 2003)
Gaming Performance

The SN41G2 showed stellar performance in desktop / business applications and, of course, there are similar expectations on the integrated GeForce4MX graphics. Compared to the original nForce IGP based on the GF2 core, the major magic ingredient that has been added is the implementation of hidden surface removal in hardware that is responsible for almost a doubling of frame rates in certain applications (according to the original presentation at the nForce2 launch).


Comanche4

Comanche4 is sensitive to both CPU performance and especially to memory / chipset latencies. It is not surprising, therefore , that running the memory bus in synchronous mode gets the highest score, beating the A7V8X. Moreover, increasing the memory bus to 166MHz or even 200 MHz does not increase oerformance, on the contrary, it causes a performance hit.

3DMark2001SE

3DMark2001 shows some of the limitations of the integrated graphics but overall, the score is more than acceptable, switching over to the RADEON 9700 brings the SN41G into immediate vicinity of the A7V8X with the memory bus running at 166 MHz. Increasing the memory frequency to 200 MHz causes a performance hit just like it did in Comanche4.

UnrealTournament 2003 (Demo)

Since there is no point in running the memory bus at different settings, we only show the performance at 1024x768x32 bps for both Antalus and Asbestos with either on-board graphics (red) or else with running the Tyan Tachyon 9700Pro (blue). Of course, there is a performance hit but even with all details set to the highest levels possible, the game remains playable. Once again, we have to give the highest scores for the IGP as well as for overall system performance.

next page:    => Overclocking, Conclusion =>

Click here! If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed