Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:
CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
The Details
The Board, Test Configuration
Memory Performance
IDE Issues
Gaming Performance, Conclusion
 SIS648 Chipset    
The Name of the Bandwidth
(Review by MS, July 24, 2002)

Memory Performance

The reference board has a multitude of different memory ration settings that would fill some 10 pages right here but we are only interested in whether the new chipset manages to increase the performance at the fastest speed, that is DDR400 or PC3200. We were able to post at 200/400 MHz and 2:2:2 timing settings but there was not enough stability to complete a boot into WinXP. The default setting for DDR400 operation is 2.5:4:4:7 and we have to give credit to SIS to not offer any bogus settings like CAS=3 that are not supported by the current DRAM technology but instead sticking with the facts.


SiSoft Sandra 2002

SiSoft Sandra buffered memory bandwidth at default setting. Those scores are nothing short of excellent.

SiSoft Sandra buffered memory bandwidth at 2.5:3:3, we managed to squeeze a bit of extra performance out of the system.

SiSoft Sandra memory bandwidth on the SIS 645DX-based ASUS P4S533, the SIS648 reference board at the "slow" setting (2.5:4:4) and "fast" (2.5:3:3) and the Iwill P4R533N as i850 dual PC1066 Rambus system. Compared to the dual Channel Rambus system, the SIS 648 chipset still falls a little short but Sandra is a synthetic benchmark and we'll see some different scores in other benchmarks. (Int scores: grey; Float scores: red). Important is that there is an improvement over the SIS 645DX chipset, even if it is only minor.

next page:    => IDE Performance =>

Click here! If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed