Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Wildcat VP990
The VPU
Command / Vertec Processors
Generating Textures
AA and a huge cache
Specs and Reality
Test Configuration
Fill Rate, T&L Performance
ViewPERF 7.0
3DS Max benchmarks
Phoenix, Caligari TrueSpace
Conclusions
Your Comments?

Find the Best Deals on 3DLabs graphics Cards

 3DLabs Wildcat VP990
512 MB LFB but...
Whatever Happened to the Specs
(Review by MS, August 1, 2003)

Summary

3DLabs have been a leader in professional graphics for quite some time. Names like Oxygen and even the Permedia3 still turn some heads, not to mention the 3DLabs Wildcat series. Today's review focuses on the current flagship, that is the Wildcat VP990, equipped with no less than 512 MB on board DDR graphics memory.

Cinematic quality rendering has become a major part of the professional graphics market and it does require different hardware configurations than just a standard desktop card, even if it is modified to optimally fit the professional sector. Which part of the market sector does the 3DLabs Wildcat VP990 fit into and what, aside from adding extra memory has changed since the acquisition of 3DLabs by Creative Labs?

I believe, we have some really interesting findings to report


Today's markets for graphics processors can broadly be described as a four segment market, with the major bulk still being those office application-compliant 2D graphics engines with very limited 3D capabilities. The next tier would be the high-end corporate display cards with advanced features like high-end color precision for graphics designers and dual monitor support plus a few extra gizmos like head casting / lip synching for imitation video conferencing. The third tier is the playground for the ATIs and nVidias and globally referred to as the gaming market. Last not least, there is the high-end professional graphics market.

3DLabs Wildcat VP990; click for larger image.

The big guns in that particular market have historically been FireGL (now under the umbrella of ATI), nVidia with their Quadro series and 3Dlabs. In the last two years, nVidia has become a very dominating force in the professional sector, especially with OpenGL applications such as used in SPEC.org's ViewPERF benchmark suite. The countermeasure has been a limited alliance between ATI and 3Dlabs at least to the point of stopping some of nVidia's "tour de force" approaches like overrunning the market with proprietary shader languages like Cg.

The high-end professional graphics market is not a homogeneous entity either, there are OpenGL CAD applications that thrive on triangles / second which, combined with high precision of the rendered images in OpenGL is more the classic high-end market. A relative newcomer to that scene is the realtime rendering of large scale models for computer-generated images and cinematic real time rendering, which gains increasing foothold and importance in the movie industry. Contrary to some gaming applications, still following some stereotypical patterns, it is the absence of such patterns that really makes cinematic quality what it is.

Absence of patterns, in turn, requires a high number of independently functioning programmable subunits or shaders, rather than the somewhat limited flexibility of register combiners, a term used by 3Dlabs for the first generation pixel shaders developed by nVidia and ATI. That was awhile ago, though. Another requirement for independently rendered subunits is a huge memory space available in form of a unified frame buffer with flexible "on-the-fly" allocation of the overall memory space to hold vertex OR texture data as needed by the application.

So how are those differences in architecture put into real hardware? No worries, we won't go into gory detail, it'll be a brief description of the key features only in the following and then we'll concentrate on what is on every man's mind in the non-Freudian sense (even though "performance" has become a somewhat tainted word as of lately).

Next Page:    => The Paradoxical Term of "Visual Processing Unit" =>

Click here! If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits