Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
V8460 Pure
V8460 Ultra Deluxer
V8420 Pure
Specs, Test Setup
Quake3 Arena
DroneZ, CodeCreatures
3DMark2001SE
Overclocking, Antialiasing
Confessions and Connfusion

Hot Offers for the ASUS V8460

Hot Offers for the ASUS V8420

 ASUS V8420 Pure / V8460 Ultra Deluxe
The Art Of Deception
(Review by MS, July 31, 2002)

Some specs

Performance of the GeForce4 Titanium series as of any other graphics adapter is limited by three factors:


This may sound somewhat trivial, but it is important not to forget that raw clock rates are not everything. GPUs are using extremely short pipelines and, therefore, have to run at much lower clock speed than current CPUs which is one issue. Another issue is the fact that there are fundamental differences between different architectures and different implementations which is why the often cited "At Default Settings" is not only meaningless but absurdly wrong when it comes to more sophisticated applications like DroneZ. That is, default settings encompass totally different feature sets for e.g. the nVidia cards and the ATI RADEON series. But I digress.

Within the same architecture, however, it is a perfectly valid approach to compare operating frequencies and the resulting theoretical values and that is what we are gong to do right here and now. As a sanity check we are adding the relevant numbers for the GeForce3 Ti500 and the ATI Radeon 8500.

GF4 TI4600GF4 TI4400GF4 TI4200RADEON 8500GF43 TI500
core clock 300275250275240
Pixel Pipelines44444
Fill Rate (Single Texture) [MPixels/sec]1200110010001100960
Fill Rate (Multi Texture) [Mtexels/sec]24002200200022001920
Memory Clock [MHz]650550444550500
Memory bus width [bit}128128128128128
Memory Bandwidth [GB/sec]10.48.87.18.88.0

Test Configuration

  • Hardware
  • SIS 648 reference board
  • Intel Pentium4 2.53 GHz
  • ASUS V8460 Ultra Deluxe GeForce 4 Ti4600
  • ASUS V8420 Pure GeForce 4 TI 4200
  • ASUS V8200 T5 GeForce3 Ti 500
  • ATI RADEON 8500 (Retail)
  • 1 x 512 MB Mushkin Level2 222 PC2100 DDR**
  • IBM 60GXP 20GB HDD
  • Acer 32 x CDROM
  • SMC BDT9332 Etherpower
  • Maxtor Ultra133 ATA Adapter
  • Software
  • WindowsXP Corp. Ed.
  • AGP Driver v1.10.03
  • IDE driver v1.01.13
  • Detonator 30.00 drivers
  • ATI RADEON 7.74
  • 3DMark2001 SE
  • DroneZ
  • Quake3 Arena
  • ViewPERF 7.0
  • Codecreatures

Time to move on to the benchmarks ...

Next Page:    => Quake3 Arena =>

Click here! If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits