Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Pro Vs. XT
ATI à lat ASUS
What You Get
the Operation
Test Setup
Aquamark3
3DMark2001SE (Default)
3DMark2001SE 4xAA
3DMark2003
Comanche4, CodeCreatures
UT2003
X2-Rolling Demo
MDK2
Conclusion

Give us some feedback

 ASUS RADEON X800Pro to XT
(Review by MS, June 16, 2004)
ASUS RADEON
9600XT At:

The Performance Conundrum

Utilities can lie and go by what some configuration data tell it to display, and moreover, we did not have the necessary diagnostics files to establish beyond reasonable doubt whether, in fact, we (or anybody else) were capable of rescuscitating the catatonic four pipelines missing from the X800Pro core. We observed that even after closing the cut bridge, the performance did not waver, that is, we achieved (within the margins of error) the exact same benchmark results as before. All this changed as soon as we flashed to the new BIOS.


After flashing to the new BIOS, we ran Aquamark3 as a perfunctory test and .... saw a performance hit.

Top to bottom: AX-800Pro =>XT (maroon); AX-800Pro (turquois); RADEON 9800XT (yellow); GFFX5900 (blue); RADEON 9800 Pro (pink). The original AX-800Pro is the fastest card in the group with over 59 fps and the highest GFX performance index.

One swallow does not make a summer and one benchmark does not establish a performance profile either. As it turns out, the Aquamark3 results were extermely reproducible, albeit totally isolated since the trend shown above was reversed in all other benchmarks we further ran.

Next Page:    => The Performance: Not So Paradox Anymore =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits