Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
Specs
Control Panel
Test Setup
3ds max5
SPECapc, ViewPerf 7.0
SPECapc for Maya 5
Phoenix
Springmark
Conclusions

We appreciate any feedback here

Best Deals on FireGL

 ATi FireGL X1
DX9 Capable for OpenGL
(Review by MS, Oct 15, 2003)

Phoenix

Phoenix simulates pyrotechnics in software. Rendering is done almost exclusively on the level of the GPU or VPU or whatever it is called with very little CPU influence. We rendered the Phoenix V2 sequence using 55 sprites and polygon antialiasing to max out both the local frame buffer utilitzation and the actual workload on memory and VPU for 200 frames. Phoenix is a benchmark that requires large amounts of onboard memory and that is where even the Quadro4 has an advantage over the FireGL X1 since it can dynamically allocate any amount within its frame buffer to either texture or geometry, whereas, to the best of our knowledge, the FireGL-X1 uses fixed size frame buffers (but we have not heard back from ATI on that matter yet)


Rendering time in seconds, lower is better. One thing about our results here is that the Quadro4 980XGL received a boost in performance since our last review that we cannot explain. In our review of the Wildcat VP990, the Quadro4 took a little over 14 min to do the same that it accomplished now in 8 1/2 minutes. To the best of our knowledge, we were using the exact same configuration and settings but try as we might (and I repeated this about a dozen times), it was not possible to extend the runtime beyond 8 min 30 sec. At the identical settings, the results for the FireGL match benchmarks supplied by Creative Labs but since we had to return the Wildcat, there is no chance to verify that the VP990 scores would stay the same. We believe they would. Bottom line is that the FireGL X1 is falling behind by quite a margin.

Next Page:    => Springmark =>

Click here! If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits