Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
The Market
Technical Hi-Lights
Test Configuration and Benchmark Overview
3dsmax 8.0
Maya 7.0 (Phoenix)
Springmark
SPEC ViewPerf
Final Words
Update: Gaming Performance

Give us some feedback

 nVidia Quadro FX1400
The Midrange Solution for Almost Anything
(Review by MS, June 13, 2006)

3dsmax 8.0

As we mentioned in our review of the Quadro FX 4500 pair, the benchmark suite originally supplied with 3dsmax 5.0 as part of the learning and training package is somewhat outdated. That is, upon launching the application, it will generate an error message about an outdated file format, moreover, some of the scenes don't run at all or if they do, only after manual reconfiguration of the data path for the necessary textures etc. In order to avoid any skew of our results that could stem from importing a different file than that used in the original benchmark, we only used those applications that ran natively in 3dsmax 8.0 and discarded those that needed modifications. As a result, we only have eight of the original set of ~ 20 scenes that we benchmarked using FRAPS. Aside from these obvious issues, there may be differences in the porting of the files to the new version but those issues are outside of our control. All applications were run at 1280 x 1024 screen resolution. We used the latest version of nVidia's Maxtreme drivers (8.00.03) . All results are given as fps (higher is better).

4 ViewPorts

For comparison, we show data from older professsional graphics cards that went through our labs over the past few years. Arguably, also the platforms were different at the time, however, even then, the graphics cards were the limiting factors for performance. The Quadro FX4500 data, though, are directly comparable to those of the FX1400 since they were obtained using the identical system configuration.

8 Spots

The 8Spots scene is incorrectly rendered by most graphics cards, unless they recognize and execute the "overshoot flag". Correct execution of this feature does require the installation of the Maxtreme driver update.

Overall, the FX1400 performs quite well, given the relatively low price tag compared to the FX4500. In the 4Viewports benchmark, the older Quadro FX3000 pulls ahead, courtesy of higher clock speed and more on-board memory whereas the 8Spot benchmark shows the FX1400 in its best light.

nVidia Quadro FX 1400

Next Page:    => Performance: 3dsmax 8.0 Continued =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits