Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
The Market
Benchmark Woes
The Devil in the Drivers
Tech Specs
Benchmark Overview
3dsmax 8.0
Phoenix
Vertex Performance / Memory Usage
ViewPerf 8.1
SLI Antialiasing
Final Words

Give us some feedback

 nVidia Quadro FX4500
Pushing the Professional Envelope with SLI
(Review by MS, February 1, 2006)
nVidia Quadro FX4500 SLI

SPEC.org vierwperf 8.1

We briefly brushed upon the issues with viewperf in the beginning of the article, that is, the outdated software versions that are single-threaded only and so on. Nonetheless, viewperf is an interesting benchmark geared towards high end professional graphics cards even though it is oftentimes abused to run with consumer cards - for whatever that's worth.

The detailed viewset descriptions are available here, for easier digest of the results we show screenshots of each application (courtesy ot SPEC.org) .

For testing, we used a different approach, in short, we were interested in whether there were any differences in the SLI interfacing, that is, whether there are differences between the nForce4 Pro with its 2 x16 lanes SLI configuration and the standard SLI with 2 x 8 lanes. We also tried to look at the impact of different CPUs, that is single vs. dual core Opterons and different clock speeds for both CPU and, conversely, for the GPU / frame buffer of the graphics cards to pinpoint the bottlenecks.

3dsmax-03

Bugs: with any but the 83.xx drivers we experienced a rather strange bug: Unless there was a separate USB device plugged in (we were using a logitech wireless mouse), we found a bimodal distribution of average frame rates with one set around 25 fps (average) and the other one aroud 45-50 fps. The solution to the problem was that as long as we manually kept wiggling the mouse, the system remained in high-speed mode, as soon as the mouse was left idle, the system defaulted into "slow mode". At this point, it is stil not clear what actually caused this issue but it was 100% reproducible even throughout several format c: and reinstallation of the operating system, drivers and applications.

Frames per second, higher is better. The maroon columns show the Foxconn board, the blue columns represent the DFI board with the multipliers given for each CPU at a bus clock of 200 MHz. The -2898 moniker indicates running at a 14 x multiplier and 207 MHz bus speed for 2989 MHz clock speed. The "OC" suffix indicates overclocking of the Quadro FX4500 to 500/1300 MHz [core/memory]. Pink and rose columns represent running in a WoW under Windows XP-64 at 2898 MHz CPU clock and standard / overclocked graphics adapters.

There are a couple of things that stick out:

catia-01

3dsmax was the only application sensitive to the "mouse-bug", no other application was affected

Frames per second, higher is better. The maroon columns show the Foxconn board, the blue columns represent the DFI board with the multipliers given for each CPU at a bus clock of 200 MHz. The -2898 moniker indicates running at a 14 x multiplier and 207 MHz bus speed for 2989 MHz clock speed. The "OC" suffix indicates overclocking of the Quadro FX4500 to 500/1300 MHz [core/memory]. Pink and rose columns represent running in a WoW under Windows XP-64 at 2898 MHz CPU clock and standard / overclocked graphics adapters.

Summary:

Creative Labs
Wildcat Realizm 800

Next Page:    => Ensight-01, Light-07 =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits