Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



























































































































































































Search Prices:


































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Yesterday's Fast
The Bundle
Avivo, VIVO, and Overclocking
Test Configuration
Futuremarks
FarCry
HalfLife2
Final Thoughts

Give us some feedback

 Sapphire RADEON X1950 Pro
Make Friends with Yesterday’s Fast
(Review by Aaron (Ludicrous) Vienot, November 26, 2006)

Performance

We should point out an earlier review of the Sapphire X1900 XTX here. That card is older than the X1950 XTX presently leading ATi’s lineup, but the hardware setups were very similar and some comparisons can be made between results there and here, provided the memory and CPU discrepancies are respected.

3DMark

After watching Proxomitron get invaded numerous times (and wondering why someone on defense didn’t shut down the affair with a simple flame thrower), we obtained the following:

Our best result for 3DMark05 (some of the scores of 3DMark'05 depends on the level of caching of the benchmark and repetitive runs will show increasing scores until the performance levels)

A typical result for 3DMark06.

The freeware versions of 3DMark only report an overall score (ed. Note: all he needed was to ask for a key but haste is the privilege of the young). As shown, these returned 9681 for our best 3DMark05 run and 4202 for a typical 3DMark06 cycle.

What does that equate to? The tests are a sum of parts, including some new, nominal-CPU tests in 3DMark06 that redefined the meaning of ‘glacial progress’; we can only comment that the 3DMark06 rendition of the Battle of Proxomitron was definitely jittery on the X1950 Pro, although it was still far easier on the eyes than watching the original DOS-mode Quake strangle a Cyrix 5x86-100. (Point of reference: if you have no clue what “DOS”, “Quake”, or “Cyrix” are, I’m not too old; you are too young. Crack open those history books and get off my lawn.)

To see what those results translate to in real life, we need actual game tests.

Next Page:    => Performance: FarCry =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits