Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



























































































































































































Search Prices:


































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
PCIe Lies
AGP Options
Tech Specs, Noise and Power
Test Configuration
Futuremarks
FarCry Pier
River, Volcano
F.E.A.R.
Prey
Quake4
X3-Reunion
Final Thoughts

Give us some feedback

 Sapphire RADEON X1950 Pro 512 MB AGP
The Proof is in the Frame Buffer
Sample supplied by Sapphire
(Review by MS, Jan 1, 2007)

A few weeks ago, we were looking at the Sapphire X1950 Pro graphics adapter in its default version as PCIe card. Arguably a "best buy" candidate, the X1950 Pro has all it takes to become the ultimate object of desire for anyone owning a single PEG slot system and, therefore, deprived of even the slightest hope of ever running in SLI mode - driver hack or not. More intriguing, especially in view of the modest price point is the 1950 Pro for anybody with an obsolete AGP system, that is, if such a version of the card were indeed available.

As it happens, the prayers have been answered by Sapphire (and a few others) with the release of the RADEON X1950 Pro "AGP", using the established technology of ATI 's, er, Rialto's PCIe-to-AGP bridge chip we have seen already on the X1600 Pro. In terms of bandwidth requirements, there is little question that the AGP x8 interface with its 2 GB/s bandwidth suffices for most games currently out there. If anywhere, quantitative differences should show in some CAD applications and even those, as we found out only a few weeks ago are hardly noticing the difference between a PCIe 4x and a PCIe 16x interface , where the raw bandwidth of the PCIe 4x interface equals that of the AGP x8 interface. To be honest, for most gaming applications even AGP x8 doesn't really matter much over AGP x4 as long as sideband addressing is enabled, which results in a dedicated data path without interruption by address and command signals on the same bus.

Needless to say that this reopens the entire can of worms about upgrading where and what and the general definition of obsolescence in the world of PCs. Just the accommodation of PCIe technology constitutes a severe obstacle for almost any owner of systems 2 years in use or older, since there is essentially nothing that can be re-used. It starts with a new motherboard, which in turn has a different chipset and that chipset requires new drivers and - by the way - parallel ATA is no longer really supported, so dump the Hard Disc and call the friendly operators at Microsoft for another registration key. By the time one gets to that point, the other hurdles as in new CPU, new heatsink, new power supply, and new system memory have already been mastered.

Bottomline is that the upgrade to a PCIe card often enough involves much more than just the card itself and its usually moderate to steep acquisition price, the ancillary leaks of the wallet easily combine to one major hole. Not to mention the hassle of the software reconfiguration including getting rid of all that crap that has accumulated since the last system reconfiguation. And all we wanted was just that little upgrade to play that one new game we got for Christmas ….

Next Page:    => Upgrade Selections and Bundle =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits