Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Farewell AGP
More AGP Problems
Tech Specs
The Contenders
Sapphire Details
Power and Noise
FutureMarks (Default)
3DMark05 4xAA 8xAF
DOOM3
FarCry, X2
Conclusions
Give us some feedback

 Sapphire RADEON X800XT vs. GeForce 6800GT
and a dash of RADEON X300
(Review by MS, Nov. 3, 2004)
GeForce 6800GT At:

Tech and Price Specs at One Glance

What we are going to do today is a bit of comparing apples and oranges. We have three different graphics cards with very different performance characteristics and price points and really the only thing they have in common is the fact that they are all using a PCIe interface. On the low side we have the RADEON X300 with its 64 MB of standard DDR and the rather pedestrian X300 core, on the high end, we have the Sapphire X800XT and somewhere in between is the nVidia GeForce 6800GT. This kind of ranking holds for performance as well as for the price point, the X300 in the form tested runs approximately US $50.- whereas the Sapphire X800XT will be difficult to find below US $500.- The GeForce 6800GT starts at about US$ 400.-


The main reason to include the X300 in this roundup was that despite what by today’s standards looks like anemic features and performance it is not that far that we have to reach into the past to find graphics cards with very similar performance that were running at a much higher price point and some of these cards are still around, one example would be the numerous RADEON 8500’s that are still on active duty. The performance of the X300 and the technical specs are, in fact rather similar to that of the obsolete RADEON 8500 with the exception of a native PCIe interface (the increased overclockability of which hardly matters in this case) and the support for DX9 which, as we will see in a bit does not really matter either.

Some technical specs in comparison with other RADEONs and GeForce FX

 Core Clock [MHz]Pixel PipelinesTexture Units/Pixel PipelineFill Rate (Single) [MPixels/sec]Fill Rate (Multi) [MTexels/sec]Memory Clock [Mbps]Memory Bus WidthMemory Bandwidth [GB/s]
RADEON 9600 SE3254113001300200643.2
RADEONx3003504114001400210643.36
RADEON 9600 XT50041200020006001289.6
RADEON 9700325812600260062025619.84
RADEON 9800380813040304068025621.8
RADEON X700XT4758138003800105012826.8
ASUS RADEON 9800 XT410813280328073025623.36
GeForce FX5900 Ultra450421800360085025627.2
GeForce FX5950 Ultra475421900380095025630.4
GeForce 6800GT35016156005600100025635.2
GeForce 6800 Ultra Extreme45016172007200110025635.2
ASUS RADEON X800Pro4751215700570090025628.8
Sapphire RADEON X800XT 50016180008000100025632.0
RADEON X800XT Platinum Edition52016183208320112025635.4

Sapphire X800XT:

In absence of hard specs on the up and coming nVidia GeForce 6200, we left that particular "consumer budget" model out even though it would have been very interesting to include it in this roundup. Keep in mind that the worls of graphics adapaters revolves at an extremely rapid pace and that new iterations, especially in the mid range, pop up like mushrooms on almost a weekly basis. In view of this, the above chart is meant mainly to provide some sort of reference for owners of the respective models to get an idea where to place the candidates of today's roundup compared to their own graphics card.

The fact that the rest of the system configuration will play an important role in the overall performance is another story altogether. There is some truth to the rumor that the P4's gaming performance does not live up to any of the high end Athlon64 systems, to ameliorate this, er, handicap, we are using the Extreme Edition of the P4 since PCI Express support on Athlon 64 boards is not readily available yet.

Next Page:    => ATI à la Sapphire =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2008 LostCircuits